Company news from Stereasoft. Over the last sprint we refreshed the public portfolio and the way we publish delivery stories — so prospects see recent work, not only evergreen service pages.
This is a smaller update than a full case study, but it's worth writing down: how a studio documents and publishes its own work says something about how it'll document yours.
What went live on the site
We added and polished web case studies that reflect the kind of product work we take on:
- Marketplace platforms — map-first search, listing management, host tools, and bilingual auth flows for property and storage products
- Destination / campaign sites — image-led storytelling for Madeira-style travel and conservation narratives
- Existing mobile and web work across the UK, US, EU, and beyond remains in the catalog with clearer goals, problem, and results blocks
If you browse Projects, you should see the updated set with screenshots and tech stacks that match what we actually shipped. That last part matters more than it sounds — a portfolio that quietly drifts from the real stack (an old React version, a framework that's since been swapped out) is a small but real credibility problem the first time a technical reviewer looks closely. Keeping the listed stack current is part of the update, not an afterthought.
Why we care about the portfolio this much
Studios grow on trust. A case study that names the problem, the slice we built, and a measurable outcome beats a generic "we do React" line every time — it gives a prospective client something concrete to check against their own situation, rather than a claim they have to take on faith. A marketplace founder evaluating vendors learns more from "map-first search, listing management, bilingual auth" than from a features list with no product attached to it.
Internally we also use the same structure when we brief new engineers joining a client team in Lviv or Kyiv. Writing the problem, the slice, and the result down forces a level of clarity that a verbal handover doesn't — an engineer coming onto a project mid-stream can read the same summary a prospect would, and start from the same shared understanding of what the product is actually for.
How we publish content now
Marketing and delivery notes no longer wait on a full deploy for every typo. We run an authenticated admin workflow for projects and blog (draft → published → archive), with locale tabs for EN and UK. That means company updates and engineering articles can go live the same day they are ready — while the public site still falls back safely when needed.
This is a small operational change, but it removes a specific kind of friction that tends to quietly kill a company blog: when publishing a paragraph requires a deploy, updates get batched, batching turns into postponing, and postponing turns into a blog that goes quiet for months. A draft → published → archive flow with its own admin means a case study or a short note can go out the same day it's ready, without pulling an engineer off client work to ship a content change.
Hiring and where we work
We remain a remote-first Ukrainian studio with hubs in Lviv and Kyiv, delivering for clients across Europe, the UK, and the US. Open roles (when listed) live under Careers — engineering, QA, design, and delivery.
What is next
- More case studies from active engagements as clients approve public write-ups
- Regular engineering posts on Next.js, React Native, and delivery practice
- Continued investment in intake (contact + careers) so serious enquiries land in a usable inbox
That last point connects back to the publishing change above: better tooling for getting content live is only useful if what lands afterward — a contact form, a careers application — is actually easy to act on. We'd rather ship both sides of that loop than just the visible half.
Questions about a web or mobile build? Start a project — we typically reply within one business day.